<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube Desktop - pretty Skin to watch your movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.compendiumm.com/2007/10/10/youtube-desktop-pretty-skin-to-watch-your-movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.compendiumm.com/2007/10/10/youtube-desktop-pretty-skin-to-watch-your-movies/</link>
	<description>Interesting news and posts, commented</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Felipe Veiga "Dent VII"</title>
		<link>http://www.compendiumm.com/2007/10/10/youtube-desktop-pretty-skin-to-watch-your-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Felipe Veiga "Dent VII"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compendiumm.com/2007/10/10/youtube-desktop-pretty-skin-to-watch-your-movies/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I guess you answered yourself. In this case, YouTube Desktop is in fact a Web 2.0 page pretending to be a desktop. But desktop programs sometimes adds something that wasn't missing, but it is interesting and easy to use, and that is the case in YouTube Desktop. Youtube just don't flourish the desire to watch more, and this "flaw", which I believe to be one of the biggest step to reach out for TV audience, will be corrected: either by them or others (which is the case).

About the comments: begginers mistake :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess you answered yourself. In this case, YouTube Desktop is in fact a Web 2.0 page pretending to be a desktop. But desktop programs sometimes adds something that wasn&#8217;t missing, but it is interesting and easy to use, and that is the case in YouTube Desktop. Youtube just don&#8217;t flourish the desire to watch more, and this &#8220;flaw&#8221;, which I believe to be one of the biggest step to reach out for TV audience, will be corrected: either by them or others (which is the case).</p>
<p>About the comments: begginers mistake <img src='http://www.compendiumm.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.compendiumm.com/2007/10/10/youtube-desktop-pretty-skin-to-watch-your-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compendiumm.com/2007/10/10/youtube-desktop-pretty-skin-to-watch-your-movies/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>No offense, but this blog won't go far if the comments are stale by the time they get approved :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offense, but this blog won&#8217;t go far if the comments are stale by the time they get approved <img src='http://www.compendiumm.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.compendiumm.com/2007/10/10/youtube-desktop-pretty-skin-to-watch-your-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compendiumm.com/2007/10/10/youtube-desktop-pretty-skin-to-watch-your-movies/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I'm noticing a major increase in Web-to-Desktop conversions, and really I have to continue to ask the following: 

"What's the advantage?"

I can understand blogging tools, like MS Live Writer, which has features and responsiveness that I'd never have with a web-based CMS, but I always thought YouTube's advantage was in the widespread interactivity and flexibility. How can a desktop app do any better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m noticing a major increase in Web-to-Desktop conversions, and really I have to continue to ask the following: </p>
<p>&#8220;What&#8217;s the advantage?&#8221;</p>
<p>I can understand blogging tools, like MS Live Writer, which has features and responsiveness that I&#8217;d never have with a web-based CMS, but I always thought YouTube&#8217;s advantage was in the widespread interactivity and flexibility. How can a desktop app do any better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
